“I’ve become a cartoon,” the notoriously eloquent Paris Hilton told The Sunday Times in July, “Nobody gets that how I am on “The Simple Life” is a character. I play dumb like Jessica Simpson plays dumb. But we know exactly what we’re doing. We’re smart blondes.”
Not that I believe for a second that Hilton is shrewd – catching up on her reading and pondering the state of the world when the bulbs stop flashing – but her claim that it’s an act disturbs me more. Faking stupidity in the hope of notoriety is sadder than actually being an idiot.
Dumb-blonde jokes about Hilton and Simpson have become stale, and adding to their criticism would accomplish little. Both are millionaires, both widely-believed to be gorgeous, and both appear about as intelligent as a well-trained poodle.
However, according to them, they’re laughing all the way to the bank.
Hilton is the poster-girl for a celebrity-obsessed generation. Her eminence far outshines many that actually earn their iconic status – listing the reasons I find her fame worthless would take up far too much space.
And yet, she continues to find ways to piss me off.
Christina Aguilera has shocked the country with her provocative videos and attire, angering feminists and spawning several drrrrty wannabes, but I can’t recall her ever not seeming in control. She never faked dumb or talent and, instead, challenged stereotypes of women and the tolerance of uptight grannies.
In October’s issue of Jane Magazine, Aguilera calls Hilton’s smart-blonde affirmation “sad,” adding that “it’s not moving anything along for women.”
Hilton might be a multi-millionaire, but the rest of us only make 75 cents to every man’s dollar. Had she achieved her fortune through savvy-business skills rather than from posing with a Chihuahua and dancing on bars, I might be able to shrug it off.
According to an article in the Khaleej Times, Hilton says, “I haven’t accepted money from my parents since I was 18. Since then, I’ve worked on my own. It feels good that I don’t ever have to depend on a man or my family for anything.”
Hip, hip, hooray, Ms. Hilton. Except, I get this pestering feeling that without your grandfather, your “royal” last name or your very public tumultuous romances, you would be forced to wise up to achieve any kind of success.
If women keep dumbing themselves down to fulfill a feminine expectation, the rest of us not born into an uber-wealthy family will find ourselves in a tough spot. Whether it’s an act or not, playing dumb just makes you look stupid.
Even though she does stylishly oppose the Canadian seal hunts and encouraged youth to vote in the 2004 election, she routinely wears fur and has never even registered to vote. Hilton’s political faux-awareness does little for her dumb-blonde image, or for aspiring heiresses everywhere.
Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe Hilton is a complex icon for post-feminism. She surely avows her right to riches – her cars, clothes, and entertainment empire rivaling any man’s – but, perhaps, she just makes blondes everywhere look bad.
After the bra-burning, the approval of birth control, and other landmarks of the women’s movement, maybe what’s coming next is an army of spray-tanned, bleach-blond, Chihuahua-toting Gloria Steinems.
Is Paris the front runner for the next post-post-post-eighth-once-removed wave of feminism?
God, I hope not.